In this hundredth episode of Breaking History, I decided to focus on the topic of color revolutions and foreign manipulated civil wars both in the present as well throughout history.

If you should discover that this current slide into Civil War is tied to the same principled forces that pushed the USA into its first Civil War in the 19th century, the French Civil War of 1792-1796, the English Civil War in the 17th century, and even the Roman Civil War 2000 years ago, then don’t be surprised. Understanding the roles of Young Europe controller Giuseppe Mazzini and Albert Pike’s Young America freemasonic operation embedded within the USA is a vital piece of the puzzle needed to comprehend the techniques used in the Bolshevik color revolution, and our modern age of color revolutions following Gene Sharp’s playbook.

In this episode I also carry out an audit of a wide array of post-1983 Color Revolutions led by the CIA/NED and Soros’ Open Society Foundations, and yes it ties directly into the arsonists now in play in California (and soon to be launched across the USA).

Or watch on Youtube here, Odyssee here or Spotify here

https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/2zikKqeWG96JDKTU8VPAMZ

Transcript: Civil Wars as Divide to Conquer Strategies

Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening for all of those watching. Today is the centennial episode, the 100th episode of Breaking History, and i’m glad that we can share this together. This is a big milestone. I wish it was occurring in more celebratory times, but unfortunately… That was, I guess, the purpose why this show was created in the first place: to bring about a better understanding of the context and the contours of the traps, of the crisis, that we’re currently living through in order to better navigate and problem solve with a better understanding of the past. The historic dynamics, the bad ideas, the sick ideas, the foolish ideas, that got us into these periodic messes as a civilization, while at the same time looking to the future with the best possible information, and an understanding of the nature of the enemy, humanly possible.

So today we have a lot to go through, but not too much time to go through it. So there’s going to be a lot of big ideas. Unfortunately Gordon could not make it due to certain family arrangements, so we’re going to be running the ship solo. And as many of you know what I like to do when i’m doing one of these shows by myself, is to take a little bit more of a classroom-style approach. So if you are in a position to do so, I would suggest ideally pulling out maybe a notebook or two. If not just go to the links in the description box, once this is uploaded. There’s going to be some resources that i’ll make available, to add a little bit of color to what we’re going to go through today.

So without further ado, I will begin. Everyone watching I think is pretty familiar with the Color Revolutionary efforts currently underway to destabilize the United States at a time of existential crisis and choice. There’s also hanging over the head, the arson-induced fires— literal and otherwise. There are actual fires also in California as we speak, which may or may not have arson associated with them. We know that there’s a lot of evidence of human involvement with past California as well as Canadian and Northeastern so-called “wildfires” that have less to do with climate change and much more to do with human agency. So that’s a factor in play, but we also have more metaphorical arsonists as well, lighting fires of social chaos. So we’re going to go through some of that, and we’re going to also take a step back, both geographically speaking and historically speaking. Because there’s space and time: those two aspects work together for context in the spatial aspect. It will be used to better appreciate the techniques being deployed currently inside of, first California, but then more potentially the U.S. as a whole. I’ll follow with what traps not to fall for, looking at other governments that have been faced with these sorts of choices, run by certain nefarious agencies associated with such institutions as the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Mi6, and their civilian cover organizations. Here we’re going to be speaking about George Soros’s Open Society Foundation as well as the National Endowment for Democracy to name a few, but important ones. So we’ll do that spatially, but then we’ll also look at a particular case study of the first attempt by a foreign agency to induce the U.S. to cannibalize itself into Civil War back in the 19th century. So that’ll be an interesting way to round out today’s presentation.

Before we go into that though, let’s let’s look at today’s situation. I chose to call today’s episode “Civil Wars as Divide-to-Conquer Strategies”. More often than not, when you scratch behind the surface of a lot of the Civil Wars throughout history, [you see these strategies]. You had the Roman Civil War that saw the collapse of the Roman Republic into chaos, out of which emerged a new system of Empire under the godman figure of emperor Octavian or Octavian Augustus. Octavian Augustus was the nephew of Julius Caesar, who came out victorious in the long Civil War against Mark Antony and Cleopatra.

[“For it is a corruption of the culture that leads to such internal ruination as seen in the case of both Athen’s and Rome’s lost Republics…one thing is absolutely certain and vital if we are to find peace within ourselves, within a state, within a civilization. That we must have as our greatest and utmost priority the seeking of truth, no matter how hard a sting it may feel at times and to judge our actions in accordance with the betterment of our soul and the soul of others.” -How To Conquer Tyranny and Avoid Tragedy: A Lesson on Defeating Systems of Empire, by Cynthia Chung https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/how-to-conquer-tyranny-and-avoid-a9e ]

There was a number of mystery cults associated with that entire Civil War, and occultists galore. And I think at that time, you’ll find that this was not a naturally occurring development; this was something that was artificially induced by occultists that managed what is actually at the heart of the International Deep State, both today and in the past. But also when you look at things like the Civil War between Protestants and Catholics in the 17th century known as the 30 Years War, that’s another case where we find that the 30 Years War had less to do with an organic bloodletting of millions of dead over the course of 30 years of religious war (as we’ve often been told). But had a lot more to do with Rosicrucian manipulations by the followers of people like John Dee, Michael Maier (the phoenixing alchemist), who was also very closely associated with people like Robert Fludd, Francis Bacon, and the entire founding groupings that set up the Invisible College system that had organized and orchestrated it. And there’s actually a pretty good book called The Rosicrucian Enlightenment by herself an occultist academic named Frances Yates, which i’m nearly finished with, that does get across this case pretty well (although she’s in favor of the Rosicrucians—I, much less so). But I think the evidence is presented pretty well for an inquiring mind to realize that occult forces once again were behind the burning of Europe with the idea of creating a new type of humanity, a new type of society in their more preferred image. That didn’t work out, but again we saw its influence in the British Civil War in England in the 1640s and 50s. This Civil War again had major Rosicrucian occult influences manipulating it, and as we will see again later on today, the American Civil War. I’ll add in the French Civil War of the 1790s, as well, which saw the hopes of Benjamin Franklin and his allies for Republic in France go up in flames, in the years of the bloody terror of mass bloodletting. The French Civil War itself had Freemasonic Martinist and other Freemasonic influences that were managing that shit show, turning it into a complete disaster for humanity. A disaster tearing a hole which could only be filled by another godman type of complex as Napoleon was, who declared himself the new Emperor of the World in 1800, and which did a lot of damage to humanity as a whole, which I don’t think the French have recovered from, even to this very day.

[Someone who ties these threads together is Cynthia Chung in her essay, The Birth of the Modern Templars, the Origins of the Ancient Scottish Rite and the Roman Sun King Napoleon: https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/the-birth-of-the-modern-templars ]

So all that to say, today we’re living in history. The Civil War thing, it is part of a strategy of “divide to conquer”. It’s easier to rule a divided people than a people who are united— even if they have different religious qualities, or different linguistic or ethnic qualities: of people who find their common humanity as primary, and work together for the benefit of their kids. United people are always much more difficult to conquer. They’re much more difficult to make stupid, to cut off from their better noble moral traditions, than a society which becomes tribal, parochial, detached from their past or their future, and much more prejudiced and bigoted to those who might sound different or look different from them.

So these are little warning signs that i’m just throwing out there about people throughout history who failed the test. Now to recap last week, i’m glad that we did what we did last week. It was the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square so-called “massacre”, and I think Gordon and I did a pretty fair job at evaluating the actual data and evidence demonstrating that what was known as the Tiananmen Square massacre is largely a mythology cooked up many years after the fact. That event on June 4th 1989 in Beijing was more of a Soros-CIA funded Color Revolution. We went through many of the players that were tied directly to the CIA, to George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, to the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) who were on the ground organizing in the years, the months, and the weeks prior to the development of that uprising. That uprising had less to do with students in Tiananmen Square, and actually much more to do with events occurring half a mile away, which involved agent provocateurs (much like we saw in the French or the Bolshevik Revolutions), carrying out bloodletting, killing both protesters as well as soldiers, lighting many soldiers on fire alive. And we saw some gruesome images of that. And one of the key figures in that story, who we see there in the photograph on the slide next to Ronald Reagan, is Zhao Ziyang, who was none other than George Soros’s CPC puppet. He was known as the “Gorbachev of China” in the popular press. And Zhao Ziyang was somebody who, with his Lieutenant Chen Yizi, co-ran a Think Tank called the Society for the Reform and Opening Up of China to massively liberalize and globalize the Chinese economy in the 1980s, funded by George Soros.

So we went through a lot of that, and how the plan was at the time, for this particular figure to become (in this piece of kabuki theater), the “man of the people” who would stand up against the totalitarian evil government, and be propelled into a position of undisputed power. This is kind of like what Trotsky had been attempting to do, as the preferred Wall Street-London “Golden Boy” of the 1920s Russia. That was the attempt that was also made for Zhao Ziyang now, and that failed.

We saw very briefly in the course of last week’s presentation (which again I suggest people review to get more details —that’s in episode 99), a quote that inaugurated the National Endowment for Democracy. This quote was by Samuel P. Huntington, himself employed by Zbigniew Brzezinski under the Trilateral Commission project in Kyoto Japan called the Task Force on the Governability of Democracies in 1975. Samuel P. Huntington had said:
“one might consider… means of securing support and resources from foundations, business corporations, labor unions, political parties, civic associations, and where possible and appropriate, governmental agencies for the creation of an institute for the strengthening of democratic institutions.”

He’s referring here to the fact that the CIA itself was caught red-handed in flaming protest movements around the world, in order to regime-change governments that we didn’t like, as well as just outright assassinate different leaders (democratically elected in various governments), who were a threat to this idea of Anglo-American Hegemony. A lot of this went public with the Church Committee Hearings in 1975 that unveiled things like MK Ultra and broader abuses of the CIA. And so Samuel P. Huntington, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and others basically assigned themselves the task of rebranding those functions under a more civilian garb.

We know that Carl Gershman, who became the head of the National Endowment for Democracy, had said in the late 80s: “it would be terrible for democratic groups around the world to be seen as subsidized by the CIA. We saw that in the 1960s and that is why it has been discontinued.” We also saw Gershman’s associate, David Ignatius, assert that: “a lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.” And this was in 1991.

In the years following 1975 you had several entities created, overseen by the Trilateral Commission, to fulfill the tasks set forth by Samuel P. Huntington and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Number one was the American Freedom Foundation in 1979. We had also that same year: the Open Society Foundation was created by George Soros. Keep in mind here, George Soros had earlier become a very influential currency speculator, having created the world’s first modern hedge fund to be devoted principally to speculation, and speculation against currencies most specifically as their specialty in 1968. That quantum hedge fund was made possible by seed capital from none other than Evelyn de Rothschild. So Soros, despite having been celebrated as “the guy who broke the British pound” in 1991, is actually a British imperial stooge. And that breaking of the British pound by speculating against the British pound during the time when the Maastricht Treaty was being set forth and coming online 1991,1992, gave the excuse to the UK government to say, “well we have so much chaos going on inside of our own country right now, that we couldn’t possibly get into the European Union, the euro zone, and the euro itself, as we ourselves had orchestrated it originally for all of the other members of Europe to go into.” So that provided a nice excuse to say “oh we’ll get into it later thank you, but we have to take care of this mess that George Soros put on our table. So we’re just going to keep our local national currency for now, and we’ll join you later on, we promise.” Now, I hope everybody sees how that trap worked, and how Soros was actually working for the interests of the British at that time.

The Open Society Foundation was a philanthropic organization that was created at this moment (I don’t think as a coincidence), to advance exactly what Samuel P. Huntington called for: as civilian philanthropic front group agencies, that would advance democracy-building organizations, that would usually result in citizens movements for human rights and other things, that would encourage civil disobedience, and ultimately the overthrow, the toppling of governments that we don’t like, in countries either deemed authoritarian or democratic (who cares if those countries are standing in the way of global empire).

So this goes on. In 1983 the National Endowment for Democracy Act is passed with $31 million of funding via the AFL-CIO Free Trade Union Institute, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Center for Private Enterprise, the International Republican Institute, and the International Democratic Institute, as well as Freedom House, which itself is connected to Soros on a number of levels. Let’s just say we’ll leave it at that for now. We also saw that the script, the playbook that was used to train democracy movements, mostly youth (people of all ages, but mostly mostly youth), lawyers, people even affiliated with missionary activities (with nominally “church activities” in various governments), would be given training in different impact workshop centers overseen by the NED, the CIA, and specifically the figure Gene Sharp. Gene Sharp’s creepy look we introduced last week with a documentary called How to Start a Revolution, introducing Gene Sharp who himself was a devotee of Henry Kissinger. He ran the Albert Einstein Institute at the Center for International Affairs at Harvard University. Still to this day, I think this is one of the most instrumental agencies at overseeing regime-change operations abroad, and maybe at home as well. Somebody should pull on that thread. But most importantly, this was the outgrowth of the Office of the Chief of Psychological Warfare and Special Operations Office from the CIA. Its founders included Henry Kissinger, McGeorge Bundy, James Perkins, Robert Bowie, Zbigniew Brzeziński, Samuel Huntington, and Dean Rusk.

So this was an agency that was very active in China, Tiananmen Square. Gene Sharp had even written about his own 9-day involvement at Tiananmen Square during the buildup to the violent breakout on June 4th 1989. A number of other people were also involved directly: James R. Lilley, a high level CIA figure who was doubling as U.S. ambassador at the time, and many others.

So let’s let’s now skip over to the present. That was just a little recap of what we did in summary form last week. Because it’s come home to roost; it’s come home to roost. What we have there is a Daily Mail coverage of a new Canadian report which was calling for a warning, as basically a gaming out of a scenario of a Civil War in America after the U.S. elections. And this was June 12th 2024, that this article was published. And indeed, what this Daily Mail report is covering, is something that is featured in some detail in the 2024 Report from Policy Horizons Canada (that’s the photo of the cover of it) called Disruptions: 2024, funded entirely by the Canadian government. It’s a Think Tank (kind of like a RAND Corporation thing in Canada), and it featured a number of major major “chaos scenarios” to look forward to. U.S. Civil War danger was prominently featured on that list, under the Politics/Geopolitics section. Ironically featured was also “Billionaires run the world”. I don’t know what the authors of this report were thinking, since billionaires already do run the world: it’s not just a threat, that’s a thing.

Another category on the list of Policy Horizons dangers is: “Canadian national unity unravels”. Again, this was June 2024, and plays directly into some things that are now happening clearly in Canada, with major separatist movements “naturally” emerging. This is as one should have expected, due to the institution of Mark Carney who’s committed to a certain doctrine of Empire which is reprehensible in the minds and morals of many Canadians, and especially those Canadians in Alberta on the West Coast. Here, on that point, i’ll just do a little segue. “The sense of a shared identity and common purpose that has underpinned Canadian unity is eroding dramatically. Separatist movements operate in some provinces and territories. People feel disconnected from Canada, its culture, values, climate goals, and economic priorities”: uh yeah. Yep, no shit. So that’s one thing.

A third category on the list of Policy Horizons dangers is: “Civil War erupts in the United States: U.S. ideological divisions, democratic erosion, and domestic unrest escalate: plunging the country into Civil War.” Yeah, we can see that that’s been gamed out. It has been strangely fluid, right? The transition from Biden to Trump 2.0. I was a bit surprised how soft and overly suspiciously easy that transition was, over the first couple of months. But I think that a lot has been baked in, and been planned in a very nasty way. I don’t have all of those details. We’re just going to look at some circumstantial evidence, that we can take to the bank, and educe our own hypothesis about what this is, how it works, what its pedigree is, and then how to navigate this thing.

I’ll feature the last on the list of Policy Horizons dangers. It is: “Cyberattacks disable critical infrastructure: interruptions to essential services such as the internet, electricity, transportation, water, and food supply systems are common, due to regular cyberattacks disrupting everyday life.” We’ve seen enough of the Cyber Polygon World Economic Forum War Game Scenarios to know that that’s also something which has been thought and gamed out. I don’t want to be a disaster monger, but it’s a fact that you do have to think like the sociopaths trying to play us like a video game, in order to get a better appreciation of the types of dangers that have been thought about, by those who are humanity’s enemies. And they do think about this, whether that’s a False Flag or or what have you. I think that would be likely: it would take place as a False Flag Operation, that would maybe be blamed on one of the enemy nations of those influences who are currently trying to manage the transatlantic system, possibly Iran, possibly China, possibly Russia, maybe some combination of all three.

We know that Alex Karp, the Vice President of Palantir, had said only about 9 months ago, that he believes and even desires the outcome that in a very short time, the U.S. should expect to go to war with a combination of Russia, China, and Iran. Karp is not a smalltime player. Alex Karp is significantly influential, so I don’t think he’s just speaking in a vacuum.

I won’t belabor this, since I think every viewer here is already pretty familiar and is following this pretty closely, but we do know that there are some suspicious elements [to what is now occurring geopolitically]. I don’t have any direct evidence of National Endowment for Democracy (NED) funding. There are secondary ties from Soros’s operations, to many of the things that are happening with the very violent, very organized, protests in California. And we know that there are some very suspicious things, like the fact that Gavin Newsom is good friends with both Soros and Soros’s son (featured there in the photograph). We know that also there were strange advertisements all over Craigslist, in the weeks and months leading up to this, offering qualified volunteers who are described as “tough, badass people in LA”, $6,500 to $12,500 per week. This advertisement is basically offering a ton of money for people who will get paid even if an activity has not been launched, and they just simply have to have the strength of mind to be tough and to follow orders, and to just basically run into whatever chaos is thrown at them.

I’m going to show a little video here, since we’re not streaming on Youtube right now; I think there was a strike. I would like to play a little video just to get across this point (27:44min-35:30min). I already showcased what was being discussed by the Canadian Think Tank scene.

There is a particular video as well that falls into the predictive programming operations that are in play right now. This one is a film that I suggest people have a look at. It’s from a very influential and very (I would say) nefarious film studio called A24. This is the trailer for something that came out last summer called Civil War. As one can guess, it’s all about a Civil War in a fictional not-so-distant future USA where a particular Republican President is in their third term. They don’t exactly say who —they’re trying to feign a certain degree of fiction in this, again, predictive programming exercise masquerading as entertainment.

It involves two states, Texas and California, breaking away, declaring their own secessionist movement in their own two-star state. There’s another Florida East Coast secessionist movement also that’s sort of suggested is in play in that movie at that time. But basically it’s a world in chaos. So just quickly here let’s just watch the trailer to internalize the gist of what this creepy movie is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pY-UmsE7Zek

Nineteen states have seceded. The United States Army ramps up activity. The White House issued warnings to the western forces as well as the Florida alliance. The three-term President assures the uprising will be dealt with swiftly. Let me know if you want to try anything on. Are you guys aware there’s like a pretty huge Civil War going on all across America? We just try to stay out of what we see on the news; seems like it’s for the best. Citizens of America: the so-called western forces of Texas and California have suffered a very great defeat at the hands of the United States Military. Mr President, do you regret the use of air strikes against American citizens? You’re moving to DC today. We need to go down there. They shoot journalists on sight in the Capital. Every instinct in me says: this is death. What? Every time I survived a War Zone, I thought I was sending a warning home: don’t do this. But here we are. There’s some kind of misunderstanding here. What? We’re American, okay? Okay. What kind of American are you? You don’t know? The western forces will reach the White House on July 4th. Oh my God! Get in the car; GET IN THE CAR. move move move. You’re going to hang back! I’m not hanging back. One nation. Under God. Indivisible. With liberty and justice for all. go go go go go. God bless America [screaming]

As I said, a perfectly disgusting movie. I did watch it unfortunately and not unfortunately. I mean, again, it has value; there’s insight; because you do get into the mind of the enemy when you do look, and take the time to take a deep breath, hold your nose, and watch some of these things. The manipulative quality of it can’t be overstated. The viewer is put into the position of a voyeur, being given a surrogate sort of experience through the eyes of this journalist, this photographer who’s just obsessed with getting photographs of historic bloody moments — this one coming home in the U.S. Capital. And it’s really catered to anybody who is susceptible to a woke education, who’s been processed through the LGBTQ brainwashing Frankfurt school experience.

There’s a sharpshooter who’s killing U.S. official troops who has pink and light blue nail polish, and a little bit of a rave kool-aid dye in their hair. There’s obviously an idea of dehumanizing those who might be perceived to be conservatives, who might be perhaps inclined to vote Trump, who are seen as or portrayed as ignorant evil neo-Nazi killers, who just want to kill every foreigner who’s not pureblood American born. That does happen quite a bit in this film, to the point that when you get to the the end… I’ll just say it [SPOILER ALERT] but frankly who cares, right? This is not done for your entertainment. I don’t like spoiling movies, but I will here.

They get to a point where the western secessionist militias have breached the White House with their very sympathetic journalists who are following them around, and who they’re keeping protected, who they’re actually protecting. So these western Antifa-style militia groups are actually seen very much as the heroes, because they do things to save the lives of these journalist-heroes of the story. When they get to the place where all of a sudden the President is cowering— And this is a President who has been known to have carried out the Antifa massacres of a couple of years earlier. Like I said, [that unnamed President is] in their third term, whoever this Republican President might be. [The unnamed President has] also atrociously taken down the FBI just a year or two earlier, as well, so they’re obviously very very bad treacherous players in America. Now the President is at this point hiding under his desk, and his Press Secretary is outside. She’s a woman, who’s trying to negotiate with the invaders saying: “look we’ll end this peacefully.” And immediately they just kill her. They just brutally murder this unarmed woman. And by this point in the story, the viewer is actually rooting for the murderers who just killed this unarmed Press Secretary. And then [the Antifa murderers] proceed to go in, track down this President, who they then also brutally execute on the floor of the Oval Office. And again the feeling that is designed to be created in the heart of the viewer, very cathartically, is one of pleasure out of this disgusting experience.

So that’s A24, a very influential studio, like I said. I think they’re tied to something very nefarious. They do a type of predictive programming, and a sophistication of that, that i’ve not seen before. I think it’s worth examining some of their work. So let’s get back on to the current presentation here.

So I brought up the evidence of a lot of money involved with paying for people who are willing to put themselves in harm’s way in the context of these riots. We know that there are people such as the Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis, who was the U.S. Ambassador to Hungary under Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton from 2010 to 2013, and is now and has been the Lieutenant Governor of California from 2019 to present. And she’s currently also an adviser (or maybe she was; I don’t know if she still is an adviser) to the Action for Democracy Party of Hungary, which was promoted and interfaced very closely with the National Endowment for Democracy. That’s a factor to hold in mind. That’s one particular NED-connection. It’s not 100% like “smoking gun”, but it’s a useful data point to keep in mind.

We have a woman who has been working closely with Eleni Kounalakis, who is named Karen Bass. And I think many people have probably done a bit of a dive on the background of Karen Bass. But Karen Bass is not just the Mayor of Los Angeles, she’s also somebody who had formerly been a Congresswoman, during which time she was the former Vice Chair of the National Endowment for Democracy. She was on the Board of Directors for a number of years, working closely with Eleni. The NED oversees $250 million of Federal funding, particularly for “regime-change directed operations” (overseas mostly). There was also a sub-project that she oversaw called the Global Disinformation Index, which was sort of this group that was under her command. It featured a number of operatives (journalists or CIA figures masquerading as journalists), judging and grading all of the various media outlets out there, as being more or less trustworthy on a scale of one to 100 or so. And of course the most trustworthy that came out of this study, and are still there on their website, are NPR, Associated Press, of course the New York Times: those are the good, “trustworthy” things. The non-trustworthy are pretty much any news outlet that leans conservative — guaranteed you’ll be knocked off the list of trustworthy outlets.

And one of the key figures Karen Bass worked with was Anne Applebaum of the Atlantic (which is owned by the widow of Steve Jobs). Applebaum herself is a member of the National Endowment for Democracy; she has worked with Karen Bass. Anne Applebaum has also promoted regime-change and Arab Spring operations funded by Soros and the CIA over many many years. That includes Ukraine; that includes Egypt and other things.

And so you have some people who are very influential currently in play in powerful influential positions in California. we have Gavin Newsom who has ties to Soros we have Karen Bass. We have the Lieutenant Governor of the State.

And again for those who say that this is “peaceful”, that these are peaceful protests— it’s nothing of the sort. A lot of masked Antifa-style Operations, a lot of foreign flags with iconic photographs being taken. Professional photographers seem to be often employed in these types of operations, featuring things that might make good magazine covers (on Time Magazine or other things). Like that guy over the flames standing on top of a cop car holding a Mexican flag for freedom. This is not peaceful.

And it’s not just California. This is starting there, but we have as of now plans that are announced for unleashing something much bigger on June 14th. This is the “No Kings Protest”, which is supposed to occur they say, in 1,500 cities across the United States. This implies a high degree of coordination and planning, and also a high degree of secrecy for this to be able to make it to this point where it’s only now that people are paying due attention to it. The idea is for it to coincide with Trump’s military parade for the U.S. Army’s 250th Anniversary and Flag Day. Again, it’s very big. This is surprisingly huge.
And some of the key figures that we found behind this include these two individuals. You have a former Blackrock Managing Partner Morris Pearl and President of the American Federation of Teachers Randi Weingarten, who are both involved in providing massive support through (again) front groups and NGOs, in sponsoring this Nationwide protest.

You also have a billionaire Neville Roy Singham who founded something known as the Party for Socialism and Liberation. He’s a Chicago Maoist billionaire. And this is the type of Operation Gladio Maoist that you wouldn’t actually find in China. This is the type that was used by the CIA and by the unreconstructed Nazis that did things like the Weather Underground in the ’60s the Front de libération du Québec (FLQ), the Red Brigades: all these terrorist operations that Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn came out of, who basically became later on handlers for Barack Obama and company. So the Los Angeles riot signs— we know the coordinated printing of those LA riot signs were manufactured by Neville Roy Singham’s operations. His operations also include the Coalition for Humane Immigration Rights, which used to be funded by the Department of Homeland Security, and which had its funding cut off when Donald Trump came into office. So there’s all sorts of high-level influences that I think are —worthwhile, people continuing to pull on those threads, to see what else comes out of this closet.

Here’s another iconic picture of uh two Antifa-styled rioters holding flags on a burnt-out cop car.

And here’s another image of a major riot. People might think that this is Los Angeles. it could be, but actually it’s not. This is Hong Kong in 2019 as a “freedom movement”. Most American conservative Christians were sold this lie (as they were with Tiananmen Square), that the Hong Kong protests of 2019 were all about freedom and democracy, and liberation from the evil big bad “Chicom” as they called them: the Chicom super villains. Well it was not a peaceful protest for democracy. This was a western-funded regime change operation to do what did not succeed in 1989 in Hong Kong, and it was very violent. People were lit on fire: civilians who were against the protesters were lit on fire and died. Metro stations and buildings burnt down. it got violent. rocks were thrown at cops. It was bad.

And I want to just get across that this is the same thing: the same enemies that wanted to destroy the United States are the same enemies that have wanted to destroy China and other countries. We’ll look at a few — I just want to really make this visceral, okay. And I say 2014 and 2019, because there were two NED Color Revolutions that both were subverted by the Chinese government, but were both very dangerous. The 2014 one was known as the “Umbrella Revolution”. Umbrellas were sort of the unifying motif that brought as a symbolic feature, these different rioters together. This is just one, and the umbrella served also multiple other purposes including protecting the identities of people from drone observations and other things like that, as well as just CCTV cameras. And number two it would also obscure guns, molotov cocktails, more violent weaponry, that would then be hidden from the cops: the police officers who were not even allowed themselves to be armed at all. They could hold sticks, tear gas, and plexiglass shields, but Chinese police don’t carry guns, so it created certain usefully chaotic situations. And pictured, is just an example of some of the rioters moving on and attacking the cops. And yeah it was in that scenario, and the cops doing the same thing inversely. And the idea was you would have those who would throw bricks, molotov cocktails, and try to kill a cop. You’d have evidence as we saw with Ukraine later on, of protesters also being attacked by shooters that would then be blamed on the cops. And we found also foreign flags. Just like we have foreign flags in LA (in that case Mexican). In the case of China, you had a lot of foreign flags show up. In China’s case, American flags, with placards that were spread all over the place. Again, masked Antifa-style mostly young people assigned to do the heavy lifting, and to get a little blood going on their face (because they want their paychecks), calling for Donald Trump and the U.S. Congress to pass the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, to come in and to save them militarily from the big bad Chinese.

This is, by the way, what Nancy Pelosi was promoting and was behind, as well as many Neocon freaks (like Lindsey Graham and others) were promoting this sort of thing, under the idea of extending “democracy”. Again, this sort of imagery warmed the hearts. And I think everyone can understand why a Christian conservative-minded person would see this sort of imagery and feel all of a sudden, warm fuzzy feelings inside, that “wow we have real American-loving freedom-loving Chinese young people, out with American flags and pictures of Donald Trump, out courageously resisting the big bad Chinese government.”

No, these are again Antifa-style violent protesters, left and right. I would say: misusing the American flag, as well as the British flag, which is another irony. And I was actually in Hong Kong in 2019 in September for a conference, and I got to see this with my own eyes: tons of British flags all over. The protesters calling for Britain to come in and reacquire Hong Kong as their territorial possession, as it was for 99 years after the Opium Wars. And this was another peculiar aspect of this thing.

So again, a lot of evidence of CIA-British Mi6 Operations. And we see this unfolding, the same play bill. That’s Samantha Power pictured on the bottom left, taking a picture with all of the democracy activists being trained at some Hungarian University. This is the Hungarian Color Revolution attempt of 2023. It’s still a danger! It was suppressed a little bit. But these young people were trained to use social media to put out and project images of peace and happiness, but in reality carry out very aggressive acts of burning down police stations, and just doing what you do to try to get a rise. The key is, that they want the state to come down violently. They want young people to be sacred sacrifices. That’s part of what makes this work. So that’s Hungary. Again, Samantha Power: big player in that, as was both Karen Bass, who would have been working with Eleni Kounalakis. Eleni Kounalakis, at the time of Obama and Hillary’s oversight of Hungary during her time as Ambassador, was also advising a National Endowment for Democracy anti-Orbán Operation (that I mentioned earlier called the Action for Democracy). And again, Karen Bass was very close to that thing too.

Ukraine EuroMaidan 2014, some pictures: not peaceful protest. This involved neo-Nazis. It involved a variety of operatives who were being funded and supplied all sorts of logistical support and money by people like Victoria Nuland, the Ambassador to the United States. [Operatives] turned the U.S. Embassy in Kiev into a headquarters to organize and coordinate the EuroMaidan. It involves, as certain books and researchers have proven already, agencies brought in from Georgia: mercenary groups with neo-Nazi proclivities, who are brought in, funded by western intelligence, to shoot at both cops and protesters who were both killed. And basically that’s part of the formula. And they were afterwards flown out; they were there in Kiev during that most violent aspect of the Maidan.

You had the same thing, the National Endowment for Democracy funding the Georgia Color Revolutions of 2003 and 2023. There’s some pictures. And again, foreign flags of the United States and the European Union galore. A lot of masked provocateurs who don’t want to be filmed (for good reason).

Egypt’s Color Revolution 2010 that overthrew President Hosni Mubarak, who had been trying to work with Muammar Gaddafi to create an alternative to the IMF-controlled banking system based on large-scale development projects. He had to be overthrown. The Muslim Brotherhood were the sort of neo-Nazi-styled battering rams that were used, whenever people simply wanted reforms, more economic opportunities— that’s why the people were protesting. But then, lo and behold, once a bunch of bodies are in a certain area in Cairo or some other place, all of a sudden masked groups appear on the scene with AK-47s and guns, and they call for the overthrow of the government. And before you know it, it gets violent fast, and the entire mob gets swept up into the chaos, despite the fact that most people didn’t show up in order to do that at all.

 
A picture of the Libya Color Revolution:

All right, so we have a sense now of the international contour of this. This is not something new. I left a lot out. There’s a lot of other examples: Tajikistan, other nations: some that have been targeted successfully, some cases unsuccessfully, for regime-change. You had the Soros-funded Snow or White Ribbon Color Revolution attempt in 2010 or 2011 to overthrow the Putin government. We had in Iran, George Soros funded regime-change operations called the Green Revolutions as well, which were suppressed, but still are a factor. These governments have pointed out (Iran has and other nations have), that a major part of what allows for these things to be successful, is the presence of (and i’ll just say it, because it’s true; i’m not making this up) Elon Musk’s Starlinks which have been provided for regime-change efforts in various governments including in Venezuela, including in Bolivia, including in Iran, and other places. So that’s a thing; that’s a uncomfortable fact floating around. I’m just going to put that out there as a thing.

Also I would say the Peter Thiel Palantir Operation that I mentioned earlier, and Alex Karp, sociopathic freak who has been a very close lifelong associate and ally with Peter Thiel, also are very very dangerous aspects to what this might involve as part of a game plan. People who have been reading some of my my more recent articles on Badlands Substack would know kind of what i’m talking about.
https://badlands.substack.com/p/why-i-just-dont-trust-elon-musk

So what is generally desired here? Well just to be clear, as I already mentioned, it’s the divide-to-conquer strategy. The idea of “Balkanizing” target countries. What do they do? They take different ethnic minority groups and religious minority groups, and then these intelligence agencies will try to work and organize them to become very very pride-filled tribal-based armed organizations with a certain fervent religious-like desire for separation, from whatever nation that they happen to be a part of.

This is done by amplifying and organizing textbooks that feature a narrative of their histories that amplify all of the injustices that had befallen various groups. Whether it’s the Tibetans, whether it’s the Muslims in the West of China, whether it’s the Taiwanese people, or the Koreans, or the inner Mongolian peoples of northern China, or whether it’s the Ukrainians, or the Georgians: they’re given western-sponsored re-crafted narratives of their own history. This is how it works. This is the formula: a re-crafted narrative of history that overly glorifies some imagined past period of grandeur and greatness. When you might have had the Polish-Lithuania empire as this great noble, often hereditarily more endowed, super nation, super empire that had been so wronged by a lower inferior people (a Slavic, a Mongolian people of some sort who are just inferior). And then all of the images of the abuses that the ancestors of the current living people reading these textbooks have suffered, is supposed to be relived cathartically (in those young people especially), who are often targeted in the school system, to receive sort of a victim identity. They did this again with the younger Ukrainians who were given a story about their past grandeur as a super human race of Nordic Warrior Viking types, abused by the inferior Russo-Slavic Moshkovich peoples who just abused and genocided them again and again and again.

And the same thing goes as well for, as I just mentioned, the National Endowment textbooks that have redefined Tibetan history, to try to make it seem as though before China came in (in the 1949-1950 period), Tibet was this harmonious land of peace and harmony and brotherhood, and not the actual feudal dictatorship under the Dalai Lama and Monk system that had kept the population at a state of squalor with 89% illiteracy and average life expectancy of 31 years-of-age before 1948. It was done entirely with a highly abusive, black magic-kind of esoteric Buddhism, that had animated the Tibetan Buddhist-sort of society at that time. Genghis Khan had instituted it, with the knowledge or the idea that the Dalai Lama was going to be the spiritual manager of the world government, the world religion that Genghis Khan wanted to rule over. Khan and his hereditary offspring were going to be the material managers of this forever “golden horde” empire, advised of course by the Venetian High Nobility and Intelligence. It was members of the Venetian black nobility (like Marco Polo and Marco Polo’s father) that were actually behind the empowerment of the Mongols for centuries. They had used them kind of the way the CIA and Mi6 have come to use ISIS, as a dark age fanatical battering ram, that couldn’t exist were they not receiving the intelligence reports, the logistical and financial support by Anglo-American and Zionist intelligence agencies and banking. And maybe that could be an entire show unto itself, really; there’s been some really wonderful researchers who proved this to be the case very nicely.

So the idea today is no different from what it was centuries ago, when the Mongols were spreading around the world. It is to simply divide-and-conquer target victim societies up into pieces, so that they could better be subdued under some higher agency. And this is like I said, the image that we see in a lot of western Think Tanks, of what they believe to be the more natural China. This China is highly reduced in size, with only that tiny bit of red being what they think that the real China should be: a mostly landlocked civilization. And in East Turkistan (we mentioned this last week), many of the Uyghur fighters have been trained, have gotten their head-chopping skills mastered, as they’ve been working in Africa, in Syria, in Iraq, in Libya, with the support of the CIA and with the support of Turkish Intelligence. The World Uyghur Congress actually has its base not in Xinjiang, not in Turkey, but actually in Germany, which have been providing the support for this thing. They now have a new anti-Chinese Army being built up in Syria as we speak, who are being prepared to unleash, to retake back what they believe is East Turkistan, not the province of Xinjiang.

We have the same thing in Taiwan, since Taiwan did also suffer a U.S. NED-funded regime-change in 2014, in the same year that the Ukraine government under Viktor Yanukovych was on the verge of signing a Free Trade deal with Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union. Yanukovych was overthrown because that was unacceptable. And the same thing too, when the Kuomintang Party of 2014 was finalizing a Free Trade deal with mainland China, which still is the primary trading partner of Taiwan, which is an autonomous province (not an independent country, but rather a province) of One China. When that was being done, that’s when the NED went into full damage-control, by using a lot of useful-idiot Taiwanese who had read textbooks in their school about how Taiwan was somehow a different culture from the Han Chinese untermenschen. They did what was known as the Sunflower Revolution, installing a U.S. proxy regime in power in Taiwan that cancelled this Free Trade agreement with mainland China. This is still an issue to this very day: inviting Green Berets to train the Taiwanese military to prepare for military exercises, and ultimately to use Taiwan as a disposable tool in a proxy war against China, as they’re doing in the Philippines.

So here’s another image that we see a lot of, in western Think Tanks, including in the European Union. Karl von Habsburg is a European Union Parliamentarian, and the heir of the Habsburg Empire, which is closely affiliated with Steve Bannon. Otto von Habsburg was somebody who ran the Dignitatis Humanae Institute (DHI), which Steve Bannon became the head of, back in I think 2016 or 2018. Otto von Habsburg was the protege of Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, the Godfather of Pan-Europa, the Paneuropean fascist movement, that would be a bridge towards One World Government, but that would only be able to work under a society of highly decentralized micro-ethnonationalist regimes, that would be under the control of jurisdictionally powerful fascist regions (in this case the European Union being one of several major regions). And this is part of what was known as the Euromaidan, or is known as the Euromaidan Operation tied to the NED, which has been featuring workshops on decolonizing Russia by showcasing what they believe Russia should look like as a society of something like 15 or 16 smaller ethnonational federations. Each ethnic group should get their own country in this logic, and thus be more easy to be managed under things like the IMF, the World Bank and others.

There’s Indian separatist movements too. So this is the SRI, another Think Tank that showcases the different opportunities to inflame micro-nations to be broken out and carved out of the current India. Jammu & Kashmir have a separatist movement primarily based in the region itself. Khalistan’s separatist movement is largely based in Canada. Uttar Pradesh has another separatist movement. There’s a number, as people can see right there— it’s pretty wild.

So okay that’s the idea, and that’s what they want to do to the United States, and it’s not the first time that they’ve wanted to do this to the United States, either. To get this across: this was what the first U.S. Civil War was all about. And if we don’t understand that, we won’t be able to appreciate how higher strategic thinkers were able to avoid those traps and keep the Union alive, despite all of the efforts to control a radical left and a radical right that had the sole purpose of tearing the Union to shreds in the 1850s and 1860s. Both sides were ultimately controlled opposition, much like we see the FBI front groups masquerading as white supremacist pro-trump MAGA groups today.

Many of them have occult proclivities. We’ve already talked about the Order of Nine Angles (ONA or O9A) and the Atomwaffen-SS groups of right-wing neo-Nazi organizations that have been receiving money from the FBI —that’s been proven to be the case now for a number of years so we know that this is a fact.

[Leaked FBI documents show Josh Sutter, controller of Atomwaffen and also the Satanic Temple of Blood Cult, was paid over $180,000 by the FBI since 2003 ($80,000 of which was paid out after 2018):

And we know that the left that we see actually throwing the bricks, trying to hurt and kill police officers, lighting buildings on fire, themselves the ones carrying out the heavy lifting: they represent a minority of the left but a loud one, who are being amplified to try to represent the entire voice of the so-called left. Most people, as we’ve seen in every country subjected to Color Revolution, do not want to overthrow their governments. They want some form of justice, of reform, but they don’t want to generally overthrow their governments…

The point being, is what they did in the case of the USA in the 19th century was, I would say, a Color Revolution, on a number of levels. It was modeled in some ways off of the worst abuses of the English Civil War, and how that was manipulated by Rosicrucian and occult secret societies, the French Civil War that was often manipulated by Rosicrucian Martinist secret societies, often with a certain Templar flavor to them, and a lot of them with a Stewart Restoration ideology around them, That is very much tied to activities associated with Robert the Bruce, who had given sanctuary to many of the occult Baphomet-worshipping Templars who went underground and retreated to different safe havens after 1307. These Templars were reconstituted in new rebranded forms: of which the Scottish Rite emerged out, and a certain takeover of the French Grand Orient Lodge also emerged out of this. So these are things to just hold in mind as factors.

So what had happened in the United States? Well the Civil War didn’t just come out of nowhere. What you had was just simply one of many waves that had been created, that had been battering the United States, the fragile young USA with, I would say, several key moments. And one of the things that the British used, to make this work or to make this anti-American operation function the way it did, was the problem of the discrepancy between the ideals of the Declaration of Independence. On the one side was that call that stated that all men are created equal, endowed with unalienable rights, of which include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. On the other side, the practical reality was that there was still an economy addicted to slave labor, and that did not “walk the walk”. That side still recognized the slave in the Constitution as “three-fifths of a person, that carried three-fifths of the vote,” and that could be owned, bought, bred, traded, sold, or killed, without really any legal repercussions. And that was actually protected by the law. And so that created a situation whereby those slave states premised their economy around the idea of cheap labor exporting cheap products (mostly agrarian, mostly cotton products, mostly to England —which was the purchaser of 80% of the slave power that cotton relied entirely on), and rejecting advanced technology that was seen as anathema to their way of life (it was too disruptive to the gentile aristocratic way of the slave plantation society).

On the other hand, it was also seen as too disruptive because at that point, what do you do with your slaves if you have machines that can do the work of a 100 men? Then all of a sudden you have all of these useless bodies. What do you do with them? Do you kill them? You clearly think that they’re inferior to you genetically, so do you let them go free? Well you probably think that they’re going to want to kill you, because you’ve abused them; so you don’t want to do that. It’s really an addiction. And people like Frederick Douglass, the freed slave who became an adviser to Abraham Lincoln, understood this. He became very clear on this issue, and made the point, as did Martin Luther King Jr later on, that the slave master is just as equally a slave as the black slave or the Irish slave or whomever, because they’re enslaved to their system. They can’t develop their actual human potentialities, because of the fact that they are enslaved to the system that they were born into, that demands that they act like little mini-tyrants, over a community of people who have to have families broken up and who are bred like human cattle. Even though the slave import market was banned in 1808 so that no new slaves could come in, slavery itself was not banned. Humans were bred like cattle, so that a population of 2 million slaves in 1828, grew to 4 million slaves by 1860. That [population growth] didn’t come in through slaves being brought in from Africa. That came from breeding programs. So that’s a disgusting thing that the enemies of America were able to capitalize on.

And I would say that one aspect of that, involved the figure of Aaron Burr. Aaron Burr was a key figure behind both the creation of Wall Street as we know it, and the founder of the Bank of Manhattan while he was Vice President under Thomas Jefferson. Aaron Burr was also a very close associate with the Prévost family. The Prévost family was a very leading Genoese family of Switzerland that was a leading family within the Committee of 200. Aaron Burr married the widow of Augustine Prévost’s brother, who was Lieutenant Colonel (British Army) Jacques-Marc Prevost, and a co-founder of what became the Charleston Freemasonic secret policing operation. This operation was overseen by the British Empire, which organized all of the loyalist military maneuvers inside of the Colonies during the American Revolution, and which didn’t disappear after 1781. Even though Augustine Prévost’s brother did die, Aaron Burr married his widow, and their operation became the first Scottish Rite Freemasonic Agency in America. First in Charleston, South Carolina. So all that to say, this is what Aaron Burr was directly brought into.

His nephew was the Governor General of Canada who gave him safe haven sanctuary, when he needed to leave the United States for England for 5 years. Why did he do that? Well because he was caught for the third time overseeing a U.S. secessionist movement to break up the USA. And I say a third time because what happened the first time he tried to do it, and that required that he became President in 1800, which [failed], due to the work primarily of Alexander Hamilton who fought like hell to make sure that his political rival Thomas Jefferson was elected instead of Burr. This says a lot about Hamilton: even though he disagreed with Jefferson on so many things, he fought like hell to make sure that Jefferson became President. Why? Because in his words, he made the point, that Jefferson has slaves, he’s intellectually confused and flawed, but he is not a traitor. Aaron Burr has no principles, and is a traitor, You cannot tolerate a guy like that to be President.

“Mr. Jefferson, though too revolutionary in his notions, is yet a lover of liberty and will be desirous of something like orderly Government – Mr. Burr loves nothing but himself – thinks of nothing but his own aggrandizement – and will be content with nothing short of permanent power in his own hands.” – Alexander Hamilton

Now to discuss Aaron Burr’s plan, as was outlined by Anton Chaitkin, amazing historian, as well as Gerald Therrien, another amazing friend and historian. Aaron Burr’s plan (if he had been successful) was to carve out the free non-slave states of the North, to undo the U.S. Constitution (allowing the slave states to become their own country), and then to join Canada. So the idea would be to integrate the northern free states into British colonial possessions in the North (in what’s today: Quebec, Ontario, the Maritimes), and become basically part of the British empire once again.

The second time Aaron Burr tried to do something like this, was in 1804. This failed; and he failed because of Hamilton. However by 1804, he needed to do it again, and this time he needed to become Governor of New York. And New York was sort of the economic engine of the United States at that time. If you could become the Governor there, you could get this project to work a second time. He tried and again [failed], because of Alexander Hamilton once again coming into the play and disrupting Aaron Burr’s political machinery at Tammany Hall. Tammany Hall was sort of the introduction of the most brutal Rosicrucian networks that had infiltrated the Freemasonic lodges they had organized themselves in Tammany Hall as their Burr-machinery base of operations, that later on spawned things like the Skull and Bones, and like the entire Wall Street apparatus. That was subverted by Hamilton.

So it didn’t take long before Burr said “well we just have to kill Hamilton,” which they did under an arrangement to provoke Hamilton, to get him to act very irresponsibly and emotionally. I think they probably flaunted the fact that Aaron Burr oversaw the murder of Hamilton’s son Philip Hamilton, who was a young talented brilliant mind, induced to go into a duel with an associate of Burr’s. One of Aaron Burr’s assets killed Philip Hamilton in 1802 in New Jersey, on the very same spot that Alexander Hamilton agreed to do a duel with Aaron Burr, using the same guns that were used that resulted in Alexander Hamilton’s son dying two years earlier— at the same spot. So again, I don’t think that was a coincidence. I think that there’s a story there.

But definitely once Hamilton was dead, a major obstacle was removed from the movement: the Deep State that was organized around the Burr machinery. And they tried a third time to get this division, the secession of the United States. And at this time, it required the newly acquired western territories that had been purchased by Jefferson under the advice of Hamilton in 1804. When Napoleon needed money to carry out his wars, all of these French territories (then called the Louisiana territories) that Napoleon had acquired from his defeat of the Spanish (these territories were Spanish former to that) he sold for I think a few million dollars— maybe 10 million, i’m not too sure. Napoleon sold them for cheap to Jefferson who bought them. And all of a sudden, you had these new territories, and the fight was then over what are they going to become. Are they going to become part of a slave empire that will expand, spreading this peculiar institution? Are they going to be part of a free society? What will they be? Will they remain territories, or will they become states?

So this is where Aaron Burr used one of his associates Colonel, later Brigadier General James Wilkinson, who is himself an agent of the Habsburg Empire. Recently discovered letters have proven that to be the case, as well as the British Intelligence apparatus/asset who was installed as the Governor of the Louisiana territories. Part of this new plan, this third attempt to break up the Union, involved Burr organizing with Wilkinson to join up with the British and American mercenaries who would be paid handsomely to join as a paramilitary order to organize in Louisiana and declare war, representing somehow the United States. At least that’s how they were portraying it: to declare war on Spain and Mexico, and take control of New Orleans, take control of of a big chunk of Florida at that time, and then from there with a new empowered position and organized government, march into Washington DC and depose the President at the time: Jefferson. Jefferson would have been deposed, probably murdered, and Aaron Burr would have been thus installed as the Emperor of the new USA. A Civil War probably was planned at that time as part of the product.

The diplomat William Eaton testified that Burr told him that “he would turn Congress neck and heels out of doors, assassinate the President, (or what amounted to that,) and declare himself the protector of an energetic Government.” – https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/04/25/the-1804-northern-secession-plot-and-the-founding-fathers-of-the-deep-state/

And the only reason why that failed was primarily because you had James Wilkinson, who was discovered to be part of the plan, and he yapped to authorities. You also had Senator William Plumer who was a whistleblower, who was playing along as though he was a conspirator, participating in these meetings, these conspiratorial meetings at Andrew Jackson’s estate, which was the headquarters Aaron Burr had selected. Andrew Jackson was an asset of Aaron Burr, as was Martin Van Buren, a personal lawyer of Aaron Burr employed directly for Burr and Tammany Hall at the time. And so Andrew Jackson’s estate was selected as the headquarters of the conspiracy. And Senator William Plumer blew the whistle, went to Jefferson, and basically said: this is happening; there’s a coup d’eta plot to break up the Union:

“A journal entry written by Essex Junto leader Senator William Plumer…described a conspiratorial meeting at his house involving Senator James Hillhouse, Burr, and Senator Uriah Tracy in the winter of 1803-04. During that meeting, Plumer wrote that Hillhouse ‘unequivocally declared that it was his opinion that the United States would soon form two distinct governments’; and ‘Burr conversed very freely on the subject…and the impression made on his mind was, that Burr not only thought a separation would not only take place but that it was necessary.’” -Volume One of The Clash of the Two Americas, by Matthew Ehret, Chapter 7.

So there were trials that were conducted on the Burr conspiracy to break up the union. There was insufficient smoking gun evidence, unfortunately, at that time, such that Burr was acquitted. This is where historians often stop short, and they say “oh let’s see— he was falsely accused.” Well other evidence did show up later on, including direct letters from Anthony Merry, the then British Ambassador to the United States writing to the Foreign Office saying that (I’ll paraphrase): “we’ve recruited Aaron Burr successfully who has devoted himself to the cause of recapturing the United States.” People can read that full Anthony Merry quote in my book that I just cited (pp 93-94). [Quote and more details also found here] The letters were discovered unfortunately years later.

But then, Aaron Burr’s behavior becomes very interesting. After the trial is over, he’s so hated (by a much more wise intelligent population), that he cannot really live in the USA any longer. So what does he do, but leaves to Britain via Canada. And this is where, as I mentioned earlier, his Nephew comes in very handy as the Governor General of Canada. His Nephew gives him sanctuary by providing some direct letters of introduction to none other than Jeremy Bentham, Lord Castle Wray, and other members of the British High Aristocracy. Aaron Burr then goes and meets and lives with Jeremy Bentham at Jeremy Bentham’s mansion in England. Jeremy Bentham, for those who don’t know, is not only the author of Offences Against One’s Self: Paederasty (in defense of Paederasty), Defense of Usury, and A Short Review of the Declaration (against the U.S. Declaration of Independence —really great human being, that one), he also is a prolific member of the rebranded Hellfire Club Occultists.

[More history on Jeremy Bentham:
The French Connection: The Knights of Malta, the Scottish Rite & the Rise of the Mafia Brotherhoods, Part VI: https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/the-british-origins-of-the-jacobins
The French Connection: The Knights of Malta, the Scottish Rite & the Rise of the Mafia Brotherhoods Part VII: https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/americas-young-america-movement-the ]

Aaron Burr lives with him for five years, describing it in his journal as “the most rewarding time of his life” from 1807 to 1812. So that’s where Aaron Burr is: dropping opium and just living in a daze working with and hobnobbing with the occult inner sanctum of the British Empire’s elite. And then finally Burr is sent back weeks before the War of 1812 is begun. And again, by this point, people have forgotten what Aaron Burr had done. Their attention is now focused on surviving this new precarious war with Britain that’s beginning. And Burr is able to then start rebuilding his Tammany Hall machinery.

This is where Aaron Burr got a letter in 1814, saying we need to put all of our resources behind getting Andrew Jackson to become modeled as the new hero of America, and the new President. Aaron Burr is the first person to endorse Jackson’s call. Because why? Jackson is a prolific drunkard and racist who happily oversees the mass murder of the Cherokee with the Trail of Tears, as well as the creation of the current slave concentration camp system of the First Nations’ peoples into reservations with the Indian Act of 1876 (the Indian Removal Act was signed into law in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson). Jackson is also the biggest nemesis of the Hamiltonian Bank. So even though they killed Hamilton, his banking system and broader system of protective tariffs and internal improvements was not so easy to kill. And it took a number of more years for Andrew Jackson to be the guy to finally fulfill that: killing the bank illegally, and then paying the debt by stopping all internal improvements and ending the protective tariffs of John Quincy Adams, which resulted in immediately the Bank Panic and Collapse of 1837.

And then of course you have Martin Van Buren, who’s continuing on this program for the Burr machinery: that’s also interesting. I’m just saying all of this to get across that what becomes the War of 1861-65 has these precedents. If we’re not aware of them, we won’t appreciate what was Henry Clay trying to deal with in the Missouri Compromise of 1820? What was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854? Really all that allowed for the expansion of slavery into areas that were not supposed to have slavery. What was really going on, and how was this tied to a Foreign Agency that had nothing to do with America, per se?

The Civil War of 1861-1865 was not a naturally emergent war from the USA itself. And so for this part of the last section of today’s presentation, I’m going to begin with Russian Ambassador Baron de Brunow, who on January 1st 1861 wrote (in observation of what was going on inside the United States):

“The English government, at the bottom of its heart, desired the separation of North America into two republics, which will watch each other jealously and counterbalance one the other. Then England, on terms of peace and commerce with both, would have nothing to fear from either; for she would dominate them, restraining them by their rival ambitions.”

We had many many wise people back in those days, who were on top of an understanding of what was this “British System” that did not represent the British people. It wasn’t even the British government: it was this other thing that was more the direct continuation of the Venetian Bankers that had transposed their power structure into Amsterdam 1600-1609. And then taking their power that they’ve built up in Amsterdam, [migrate] into England in the 1688 Glorious Revolution. And the creation of the Bank of England, that same Venetian Empire and its inner [cabal], which also worked very closely with Genoa and the Genoese occultists that managed the hereditary systems of the high patrician class (based then in Switzerland, or a subsection within Switzerland) as a nominal rival, but actual ally of the Venetian Bankers. [These groups] were all part of the same Patrician Class that had overseen the control mechanisms of the Roman Empire that came to power largely over the Roman Civil War that saw Mark Antony and Cleopatra die, that had seen Julius Caesar die. Emperor Octavius Augustus had a certain arrangement with the Mystery Cults, especially the Cult of Mithras (as well as the Cult of Isis, but especially of Mithras), that reconstituted Rome from a Republic into a full-blown Global Empire.

[Further reading: https://canadianpatriot.org/2023/12/31/milners-round-table-as-grail-knights-of-mithra-solar-cults-from-rome-to-the-new-british-empire/ and https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/the-french-connection-the-knights ]

So again, people today are a lot less familiar with this history that was much more well-known by people including Henry C Carey, an adviser of Lincoln. Lincoln himself had a deep familiarity with this principle and this process. They understood that the British were behind this thing. Just as a side note, the Mormons play a very nasty role, because there were three other American Civil Wars before the big Civil War finally struck. These were initiated by a certain gnostic religious engineering operation, that had been infused into creating a sub-cult that was very violent and had its own paramilitary army, beginning with the first Mormon War in 1838 and continuing until the last of the three Mormon Wars in the late 1850s. These were sort of ways to “mushify” the United States: part of rendering it more malleable and absorbable back into the fold of the British Empire. [Read https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/the-shaping-of-a-world-religion-from-63a ]

People know this map of those states that had seceded. There were disputed territories in yellow; the greens being generally those states that were part of the Union.

What’s less known, is the doctrine of those like Jefferson Davis, like Albert Pike, and like the leading figures of the Confederacy. They all happen to be members of a mixture of the Knights of the Golden Circle: a paramilitary group set up in 1852 that had over 100,000 members strong, by the beginning phases of the Civil War. The Knights of the Golden Circle, which transformed themselves into the Ku Klux Klan later on (ku klux being the Greek word for “circle”), as well as B’nai B’rith (I would say) in 1851, were also set up by a lot of the leading figures [on this shady side]. The Secretary of State for the Confederacy Judah Benjamin, was both a participant and a member of the B’nai B’rith: a Freemasonic offshoot, a variation for organizing as many Jews as possible into a different type of Judaism that would be more constructive for maintaining Global Empire and chaos operations. B’nai B’rith also interfaced closely with the Scottish Rite, which had been set up in Charleston, South Carolina in 1801, which was tied to the Burr machine Tammany Hall, and which largely came out on top after the anti-Masonic movement petered out in 1840. That anti-Masonic movement saw the destruction of almost every patriotic Republican Lodge: only the Scottish Rite North and South branch seems to have survived.

What they wanted, had they been successful at declaring independence and in creating their own Confederacy independent of the USA itself, was a Golden Circle Empire with Cuba as its new headquarters, new center, as a sacred sort of island state. This is not that dissimilar in principle from what the British had seen as their island empire designed to rule the world. And it’s not that dissimilar in principle from what they convinced Emperor Hirohito to see Japan, as an island empire endowed by a superior race, endowed to lord over the slave colonies of the world (in some weird utopian fantasy land). That’s sort of what they had crafted for them, that would involve capturing and spreading the slave system through most of that area we see there on the map.

Again, leading up to and making this Civil War possible, we had two Freemasonic agencies who were organizing together to split the Union. During the Civil War, you had the pro-Confederate Bushwhackers versus the pro-Union Jayhawkers. And that meant during the Civil War, there was cross border raids with acts of violence against civilians and soldiers. There’s one case of 130 civilians being massacred over the course of one evening, in one of these cross border raids by these terrorists from both sides— both sides. The pro-Union Jayhawker terrorists would go and carry out massacres of Confederate families, and inversely the same thing was done against the families of parts of the states that were still in the Union.

This was kind of similar to what was done by the British overseeing both massacres of Arabs in Palestine as well as Jews, using their assets like Hajj Amin al-Husayni, who was a major player running the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist operations, as well as Lord Orde Wingate, the British Plymouth Brethren fanatic who was in charge of the Ergun, and who was and is still today, known as one of the co-founders of the IDF: the Israeli Defense Forces. The IDF would then carry out murders of innocent civilians of the Arab world, and then sects within the Arab world (terrorists) would carry out massacres of Jews. And that’s the way that they work.

They did the same thing in the 30 Years War with acts of Protestant terrorism against Catholic families, and then Catholics being represented by certain Jesuit operatives, who would then masquerade as representing the entire Catholic people killing Protestant families. And they would just create this “eye for an eye” trans-generational revanchism. And they always do that.

Regarding the Young America North and the Young America South. Both of these Lord Palmerston-Giuseppe Mazzini Young Europe Operations had big penetrations into the United States. [Read details at https://canadianpatriot.org/2023/12/01/kissingers-adoration-of-the-1815-congress-of-vienna-a-master-key-into-universal-history-2/ and https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/americas-young-america-movement-the ] As I mentioned earlier, part of what makes Color Revolutions work is that narratives are crafted to brainwash young people around some “past grandeur” that makes them more tribal, that makes them more prideful, that makes them more violent, and that makes them feel more victimized by some other force (next to them, usually). That “victim identity” becomes easily violence-prone: as we’ve seen with Antifa, and with people who have been given the 1619 Project remaking of their history, who have been induced to try to declare war on the entirety of white systemic racism, per se. Then then light cities on fire, as we saw in the wake of the George Floyd riots. We’re likely to be seeing more of that now.

So again, this is not a new thing. The Young America North was introduced and led by the founder of Transcendentalism, Ralph Waldo Emerson. Emerson wrote a whole tract on Young America, calling for young people who are naturally wise because they are young, to break off the shackles of tradition and the belief that the Constitution should be something respected, and instead build a new type of society founded upon complete individualism that has nothing to do with the Constitution or America’s outdated traditions. So you had on the one hand, this type of Young America of the North.

Ralph Waldo Emerson was an asset of Caleb Cushing, who lived from 1800 to 1879. Caleb Cushing is somebody who a whole class should be done on. Again, Anton Chaitkin’s Treason in America is one of the best overviews of Caleb Cushing as a top leader of the American Deep State and asset of the British Empire in America. Cushing also trained Albert Pike, who became a leading Confederate General and later founder of the Ku Klux Klan. Cushing was also [mentor of] William Lloyd Garrison, the leader of the Abolitionists. Garrison was a devotee and prodigy of Caleb Cushing. So you have these strange anomalies. How could these individuals both train people who would go on to run the leading Abolitionist movement of the North, as well as the leading Secessionist movement of the South??? Who the hell is Caleb Cushing??? Again, we can do a whole class on this in the future, but what I can say is that the encouragement of terrorist actions to fight slavery by shooting up Harper’s Ferry (done by John Brown), was made possible because of this type of operation being set into motion.

George Saunders was a member of the Franklin Pierce Administration of 1850s. Saunders was the American Consul to England, where he interfaced very closely with Giuseppe Mazzini and Lord Palmerston at that time, being the patron of international anarchist movements and having even “Anarchist Salons” at the American consulate in England at that time. So he was known as the “American Mazzini”: George Saunders. Saunders went on to be installed in Canada during the Civil War, overseeing Confederate Intelligence operations with Jacob Thompson, that carried out terrorist raids like the Albany raids. Even the murder of Lincoln himself was made possible and was coordinated through Confederate operations in Canada, overseen by George Saunders.

So again: left and right dichotomy, right? William Lloyd Garrison: this is the person who became the voice and he face of the Abolitionist movement. He was an enemy of Lincoln as much as Albert Pike was an enemy of Lincoln. These radical Abolitionists were enemies of Lincoln. The “Copperhead Democrats” that were often funded by the biggest financial moneybags of New York at the time (like August Belmont, the Rothschild official representative in America), were just basically saying: “just let the Confederates have their own Country; we’ll have our own smaller reduced Country; we’ll join up with Canada; we’ll have a new Constitution that’s going to be pro-British pro-Free Trade; the confederates are going to have their own Constitution under their own confederacy that’s going to be pro-British pro-Free Trade.”

And in fact, in the Confederate Constitution, it illegalizes protective tariffs. It also illegalizes the idea of forever being allowed to free any slave or pass a law that frees a slave. That’s part of the Confederate Constitution. Just putting it out there, for those who say the Confederacy were the victims of that spat, and Lincoln was the bad guy, and the Confederates were just going to “naturally dissolve slavery” in time, if we were just more patient. Not true! It’s in their Constitution: slavery is perpetual. Free Trade and the abolishment of protective tariffs are perpetual. The illegalization of the National involvement in directing credit towards internal improvements, was enshrined in the Confederate Constitution, and the entire Civil War was funded by the British. The only thing that saved the United States in fact, was primarily Lincoln’s understanding of the higher principles of Hamiltonian Economics, which he applied in the form of his Greenbacks, Lincoln’s reorganization of the banking system, and also Russia’s involvement in saving the Union at this precarious moment.

I’ll add here as well, the Scottish Rite and the Scottish Rite Northern jurisdiction versus the Scottish Rite Southern jurisdiction both were part of the same scheme. Both were under the control of the United Grand Lodge of England. I mentioned already: Copperhead Democrats and the Wall Street Boston Brahmins, versus the slave power Confederates: was all false opposition. And the common theme among all of them was, like I said: abolish the Constitution and establish two new pro-British, pro-Free Trade Confederacies, who would hate each other, as the Russian Ambassador had correctly noted. The two dominant figures that Anton Chaitkin beautifully illustrates in his Treason in America . If anybody can find this book, buy the book, even if you have to pay more money. You could probably get it for free online on archive.org too. Just get the book, and read the book please.

So Anton Chaitkin writes this book in 1987. And I’m just going to quote from a small part of it. On the left (in the picture below) is J.J.J. Gourgas, and on the right is Albert Pike, and Anton is talking about the Knights of the Golden Circle. Both men representing the North and the South of Freemasonry are working together. And we see them both in their Freemasonic regalia, representing the 33rd degree of the Scottish Rite. I think that there’s probably parallel rites within the Scottish Rite that are not the same thing, just to say. Because I’ve met some people who are pretty high up in the Scottish Rite, and they’re not bad people. In my evaluation, what I’m gleaning here, is that there’s parallel degrees: one esoteric, one exoteric, even for those who are apparently being initiated. It seems to be that similar tests are given that might be answered totally differently: where one person kills the rabbit, the other person doesn’t kill the rabbit. And both people get the feedback that they’ve done the right thing, from their superior. And they’re both told that they can go to the next degree, but now because of how they responded, what those degrees are going forward are going to be a totally different set of experiences. And what both individuals are going to see, as functions for themselves, as players within systems that they may not even fully understand, are going to be totally different, because of how they morally responded. So that’s just something I’m noticing in my research so far on the occult.

But now Anton Chaitkin says:

“While the Knights of the Golden Circle, the military preorganization of the Confederacy, was being organized under the control of the Scottish Rite’s Northern chief, the Swiss J.J.J. Gourgas, and his Lieutenant Killan Henry Van Rensselaer, the Southern Jurisdiction of the Rite was organizing the political leadership for the secessionist itself. The man in charge of this project was Albert Pike of Newburyport, Massachusetts.

Pike had been a life-long friend and a decades-long protege of his townsman Caleb Cushing. On March 20, 1853, two weeks after Cushing rose to power as the attorney general of the United States, the Rite’s Southern Secretary General Albert Gallatin Mackey conferred the Rite’s exalted degrees upon Albert Pike at a ceremony in Charleston South Carolina.

… in 1859, Albert Pike was called upon to become the grand commander of the Southern Scottish Rite… The gap Pike was to fill came from the sudden death, in 1858, of Mississippi secessionist and Scottish Rite leader John A. Quitman. Over the next two years— until the records suddenly stop a week before Fort Sumter was attacked— Pike set up a Scottish Rite Supreme Council extending for the first time over the entirety of the South.”

And again, anybody trying to carry out a serious inquiry into the Civil War and its causes, while ignoring the role of Freemasonry, is going to be doing a very half-ass job breaking history. And that’s unfortunate that there’s this whole idea that “conspiracy theorizing” should disqualify one from any type of polite society, or in academia. And that’s a very dangerous logic, which has kept a lot of people from making proper discoveries about what’s actually going on causally, in their past, let alone what is actually animating their current present.

 
And i’ll just end with the last two slides here. Lord Palmerston stated to August Belmont during the Civil War that:

“We do not like slavery, but we want cotton, and we dislike very much your Morrill tariff.”

This is of course a reference to the Tariff of 1861, which was made possible once the Confederates left the Union. And all of a sudden this tariff could pass: it was not facing the kind of resistance it had been formally. And with that, Lincoln was able to organize America’s steel, America’s industry, that allowed it to start actually producing things again for the first time in many years. The U.S. only had 42 ships at the beginning of the Civil War. By the end of the Civil War, it had 670 major vessels: 22 of which were Monitor-class warships. You had also an organization of a proper industrial base, which was made possible by the protective tariff. You also had at the same time through Hamiltonian Economics, taught to Lincoln through the figure of his adviser Henry C. Carey, you had the idea of of National Banking procedures. Whereas at the beginning of the Civil War, there were something like 1,400 different currency notes (bank notes) in existence. There were about 1500 banks, but 5,500 counterfeit— different types of notes— counterfeit notes were everywhere. So every bank could issue their own notes: there was no organized national currency or regulatory regime. There was no protective policy. And so nobody wanted to invest in the USA. The U.S. was a speculative basket case of economic irrationalism.

So that had to be corrected. And it was done through a series of Bank Acts: the National Currency Acts of 1861, 1862, 1863; the National Bank Act of 1864, that allowed for Federal supervision, the Forced Reserve Requirement. So for the first time, there had to be reserve requirements in every bank. If it was going to be a bank, its directors had to reside dominantly in the state that they were running the bank. They all had to be American. You couldn’t carry out usury in the banking system: usury was illegalized. Any bank that tried to do usury (irrationally high interest on loans), would be punished, and would have to give back two times the amount that they were trying to steal from their customer. Greenbacks were issued as well by 1862 or 1863. Lincoln began to issue Greenbacks, which became $500 million of currency. If the banks wanted a charter, they had to put a third of their capital into the treasury itself. So the banks were induced to lend to the government, that then could give them currency notes, greenback notes, back: that could then circulate in money form. You had 520 Bonds that would mature in 5 to 20 years, which was very important and an innovation of the pro-industrial banker Jay Cooke, which involved the U.S. citizens financing the Civil War by buying patriotic bonds. And these became $1.2 billion dollars issued, that were then used to finance not just the war and supplying of the troops, but also things like the Transcontinental Railway, the Industrial Canal Projects and other projects that were internally-improvement based. They were based on an idea of building a better society, with a long-term vision for the future.

The Confederacy didn’t have any of that. They could only exist by massive infusions of capital from England, which had all sorts of ways through the Caribbean as well as just blockade runners that would provide weapons and logistical support to the Confederacy. Much of the Confederacy’s munitions were being supplied by British-made weaponry. Food was being massively supplied by the British, as well as warships like the SS Alabama, and many others were being produced by London. London was then providing the means for the Confederacy to continue its war on the Union.

And so all of these things were different [modes of attack], and only the Russian involvement, directly through the sanctioning by Czar Alexander II, was enough to shift the tables in favor of the Union. The British and the French got the message that “if you openly go in militarily now, and do what you’re already covertly doing; if you declare war on the Union and take the side of the Confederacy, that will be open war with Russia.” And those European countries were not prepared to take that risk at that time. They didn’t feel like it was a worthwhile gamble. So that kept England out of the War on that more full-frontal basis.

And I’ll just end here with a last quote by Lord Glascoyne Cecil, otherwise known as the Marquis of Salisbury, who as a member of Parliament later became Prime Minister three times stated that:

“The Northern States of America never can be our sure friends because we are rivals, rivals politically, rivals commercially… With the Southern States, the case is entirely reversed. The population are an agricultural people. They furnish the raw material of our industry, and they consume the products which we manufacture from it. With them, every interest must lead us to cultivate friendly relations, and when the war began they had once recurred to England as their natural ally.”

So I hope people really internalized this message. The thing that allowed America to survive was that there were people who were in leadership who decided to take responsibility: people like Frederick Douglass, Henry C. Carey, Lincoln, and many others both in America and abroad. They took responsibility for their society, based upon their understanding that their knowledge that they had earned through hard mind-work and study and passion, gave them a power to act, that was lacking in the leadership. The leadership that was otherwise being provided [by British elite] as puppets to the population to pick from. They didn’t fall for these “left versus right” traps.

Frederick Douglass broke from William Lloyd Garrison when he realized that William Lloyd Garrison was calling for the destruction of the Constitution. He said “well wait a minute— why have I never read the constitution?” And he sat down and he began studying, and then he realized that the provisions for ending slavery were actually embedded perfectly inside of that very Constitution. The Constitution had flaws: three-fifths clause, being just one of them. It’s a bad flaw. But the principles that would provide the legal groundwork to properly destroy slavery were enshrined also within that very Constitution, which he then became a defender of, He rose to become a supporter of Lincoln. He met with Lincoln, and became a leading adviser, and later on became an Ambassador to Haiti. Frederick Douglass broke with Garrison early on, when he realized how this trap was being set.

Lincoln also had to do battle with both radical abolitionists, as well as radical slave powers. He had to do battle with both. He had to do battle as well with Canadians. Not the Canadian people: but there was this other thing in the Canadian Intelligentsia that’s tied to the Jesuit and Anglican High Command which was, and still is I would say, antagonistic to the very idea of what America stands for.

But he had allies who were able to also rise to the occasion of which Czar Alexander II was a leading figure. But there were many others in France, in Germany, around Bismark, even as far as India and in China, and in a lot of Latin American countries. Benito Juárez, the President of Mexico, was a close friend and ally of Lincoln during that same time of American Civil War. Mexico had their own Civil War at this very same time. Mexico’s Civil War was run by the same oligarchical factions that are still trying to carve up the world today.

They were also behind organizing the Civil War in China: the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Rebellion that was happening for 15 years from the 1850s to 1860s. It also overlapped the Opium Wars. The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Rebellion was an internal Civil War that China had to deal with. An individual who went through a weird mystical experience and through being trained by Jesuit missionaries, discovered that he was the brother of Jesus reincarnated. And he led this —what he called the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom— in a bloody 15-year war, representing like 30 million Chinese at the time, who were induced to go and fight with him against the Chinese government, with the British threatening to provide their full support to the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom if the Chinese government didn’t fully submit to British demands for full control over things like Hong Kong and Shanghai. This amounted pretty much to all the concessions that would give Britain control of the Chinese economy for another hundred years. So that was something that was part of the same type of game plan.

They did the same thing with the Bolshevik Revolution, as well. They had done something similar but different with the Crimean War against Russia, that was less internal and more foreign-directed as a trap. But the Bolshevik Revolution was again very very similar: funded by Wall Street and City of London tycoons and occultists, trying to work to basically subdue and break up Russia as a civilizational entity, and make it more malleable and manageable under the control of Trotsky, primarily, and a bunch of Russian occultists that had an idea of “ushering in the end times”— let’s just say it that way.

So that’s not all that different from the types of ideas that are still active in our current battle for humanity right now. There’s a lot of very bad ideas, and unfortunately a lot of ignorance about what’s really shaping our world. So I think I’ll end it there… we’ll do a better job at the comments section next week when Gordon’s back with us. Until then I wish you all a good evening, good night, good morning, wherever you are. And i’ll see you all again next week. bye-bye!

Follow my work on Telegram at: T.me/CanadianPatriotPress

Leave a Reply