By Jonathon Ludwig
As of this writing, over 120 Canadian union representatives from 9 provinces (see appendix 2 below) have joined the City of Burnaby, British Columbia in calling for the Glass-Steagall Bank reform to be applied to both the “Big 6” Canadian banks as well as the world financial system more generally. From Incoming American President Donald Trump, to UK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, a growing chorus is emerging in support of bringing back the separation between investment banks, and commercial banks in the context of the global financial breakdown now underway.
While many onlookers have understood why this type of reform is necessary in the USA or Europe, where speculative activity has been more rampant than the Canadian experience, it has been less understood why it is so necessary for Canada to do the same.
This lack of understanding can prove fatal to the future security of Canada, and it is the purpose of this brief report to clarify why Burnaby, BC and the Labour union representatives are not only correct, but why this reform must be spearheaded by all patriots irrespective of parties. This leadership on the part of the patriots in Canada must occur if we will be ahead of the curve and capable of navigating Canada out of the oncoming financial disaster sparked by the meltdown of the $2 Quadrillion global derivatives bubble. [Figure 1]
It is important to understand that Glass-Steagall is not merely a “regulation”, but a powerful principle of change which transforms the global financial system at its deepest level. The primary obstacle to Glass-Steagall’s restoration in Canada remains four key myths which have spread like intellectual poison and must be addressed briefly in the following paper:
1) The Canadian Big 6 are not implicated in the global derivatives bubble
2) The Canadian housing bubble is not real and is not an integral part of the global speculative system now imploding.
3) The physical economy of Canada, which is the source of the only true value in our society is in fine health and is not collapsing.
4) The bail-in regime now being installed into the Canadian banking system will never be used to steal pensions, RRSPs, mutual funds and more due to this impending collapse
Debunking the Myths
Myth 1: The Big 6 Canadian banks are not affected by the global derivatives bubble
False: Our banks are not safer than any other “too big to fail” internationally. In fact, recent OSFI statistics have demonstrated the Big 6 banks to be exposed to over $34 trillion of derivatives, nearly all of which represent purely “fictitious capital”. This puts the Canadian banks on the same playing field as their US and European counterparts. [Figure 2]
While derivatives had no existence before 1987, within the mere 25 years since their creation, these “creative financial instruments” as they were dubbed by Sir Allan Greenspan, had grown to $70 Trillion in 1999. In the 15 years since Glass-Steagall’s 1999 takedown, these instruments have metastyzed to an enormous $2 Quadrillion! To put this number in perspective, the world GDP is only $74.9 Trillion.
This is why the economy has stopped growing; the perceived growth had been based on merely diverting investment from the real economy into speculative international capital, which has no concern for human development
Myth 2: There is no Canadian Housing Bubble
False: While the Canadian housing bubble is of a different form than that of the USA version, it is no less a bubble. It has been created by 1) the nearly 0% interest rates maintained by the Bank of Canada, 2) the $600 billion CMHC insurance on houses increased by over 2 fold under Harper since 2007, and 3) international speculative capital flooding into the Canadian housing sector looking for “safe” ground for investment in an age of global market instability.
In 2011, the average value of houses in Canada had surpassed the average housing price during the peak of American bubble of 2007 [Figure 3], and the underlying consumer debt sustaining its existence has also exceeded the average consumer debt index of the USA, with little to no re-payability in large measure.
For more information, see Canada’s Housing Bubble Blowout Amid Global Collapse in Canadian Patriot #1, Autumn 2012
Myth 3: Canada’s Physical Economy is Healthy and Growing Stronger
False. Since the Global Economy became dislodged from the 1971 fixed-exchange rate system established in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire in 1944, the world entered a speculative, post-industrial rationale more recently dubbed “globalization” which encouraged economic thought and behaviour that would have formally been considered insane.
Since that 1971 global transformation, money no longer served as merely the means, but as the ends to itself. Speculation on debt, oil, food and currencies became the perceived drivers of wealth rather than production. Under this new logic, our infrastructure and manufacturing base was permitted to decay, credit for investment in long term infrastructure, businesses and scientific research was diverted into speculation and our society became increasingly “service-based”. [Figure 4]
As a result, a debt-based economy arose in the place of our once proud industrial society, with nations and their citizens rich and poor alike, becoming ever more enslaved to usurious practices. Before this moment, the Canadian debt had never risen above $27 billion, while after the 1971 shift, we have grown an (unproductive) debt monster to the scale of $600 billion and similar rates of debt growth in our American and European neighbours. [Figure 5]
See Towards a Hamiltonian National Bank of Canada for a fuller exposition of the state of fictitious capital in Canada
Myth 4: The bail-in regime will never be used in Canada
False. By now, it should be clear that the Canadian situation is not as peachy keen as popularly believed, but certainly, what was done to Cyprus in May 2013, when citizens’ bank deposits were literally stolen to “bail in” the failing banks would never happen here! Sadly, this belief must also be annihilated, the Taxpayer Protection and Bank Recapitalization Regime which effectively allows banks to confiscate select assets in the event of a major bank failure. Canada’s 2014 decision to bring the Canadian bail in regime online alongside its global counterparts, resulted in the Moody’s downgrade of our Big 6 banks within a day.
The appearance of the bail-in regime as well as the austerity budget across all provinces are consequences of our nations’ failure to address any of the above factors in a systemic way. This has accelerated the destruction of Canada’s real productive economy when the only solution was to engage in real nation-building strategies the likes of which had last been seen under former Quebec Premiers Jean Lesage, Daniel Johnson, and their ally Charles de Gaulle.
For more information on bail-ins in Canada see May 2013’s Cyprus Bail-ins Come to Canada and Global Green Bail in Advances with Santander Scam and Canadian Pentions
The Solution Begins with Glass-Steagall!
Glass-Steagall is the only practicable measure which addresses all four of the above variables in a systemic way, by forcing the deposit/commercial banks to serve the real economy, instead of the other way around. In Canada, this program took on this program under the name of the Four Pillars which were fully taken down by 1992. This action will liberate our nation alongside a growing chorus of other nations led by the new Russia, India, China, USA alliance to usher in the world landbridge policy and LaRouche’s Four Laws in short measure. Canadians deserve to have a national credit policy that puts Canadians and their well being before international financiers, and Glass-Steagall is the quickest, surest means to ensure that credit is directed towards building great projects for transportation, energy production, agriculture, science, healthcare and space research.
 “Fictitious capital” is generally defined as financial capital not sustained by any real value in the physical world. The example of a slum lord registering “profit” merely by the absence of investment in the maintenance of his or her slum.
 Canadians Household Debt Burden Edges Higher in 2nd Quarter, David Parkinson, Sept. 12, 2014, Globe and Mail
 Ottawa unveils proposals to relieve taxpayers from covering bank bailouts, Financial Post, Aug. 1, 2013
Glass-Steagall at a Glance.
In its preamble, Glass-Steagall stated its intent: “To provide for the safer and more effective use of banks, to regulate interbank control, to prevent the undue diversion of funds into speculative operations…” The full Act, in just under forty pages, established that the banking system must be made to serve the “public interest”, to serve the general welfare of the American people as a whole, affirming the principles enshrined in the US Constitution— and outlawed anything to the contrary. In Canada, this principle was expressed under the “Four Pillars” which was destroyed under Brian Mulroney in 1987 in order to prepare for NAFTA.
Growing Support for Glass-Steagall by Canadian Municipalities and Labour Unions
6 June 2014- (CRC) – Last August, when the Committee for the Republic of Canada began contacting mayors and City Councillors across Canada, requesting that they endorse our Appeal for a Global Glass-Steagall Now, the response we received from most municipalities was: “This is out of our jurisdiction. You have to contact your Member of Parliament or Senator.”
Admittedly, they did have a point. The House of Commons and Senate would appear to most Canadians to be the place to go to do something in the face of renewed warnings that the policy adopted by the Trans-Atlantic sector nations during the 2008 financial crisis, to bailout the speculative debts of what came to be called the “Globally Active Systemically Important Financial Institutions”  while sacrificing necessary investments in the physical economy, is now rapidly leading to something much bigger than the 2008 crisis. However, as former Economy and Finance Minister of Italy, Giulio Tremonti, has warned, with governments heavily indebted and unable to continue to simply print money, “they are planning to grab citizens’ savings. They say ’bail-in’ in English, but it means grabbing bank deposits.”  While the governments of the trans-Atlantic nations may not have been responsible for coming up with the bright idea of “bailout” and “bail-in”, they did capitulate to the demands coming from key institutions of the British empire, such as the Financial Stability Board at the Bank for International Settlements. Canada adopted the FSB “bail-in” directive as part of last year’s federal budget Economic Action Plan 2013 , with a notable silence, for the most part, from our representatives in the House of Commons and Senate.
Consequently when the City of Burnaby, BC decided last November to endorse our call for the restoration of Franklin Roosevelt’s “Glass-Steagall” Bank Act of 1933, as the globally applicable model to separate commercial banks from investment/speculative banks,  we welcomed the opportunity to take the battle for Glass-Steagall to another level.
During the Canadian Labour Congress’ 27th Constitutional Convention at the Palais des Congrès in Montreal over May 5 – 9, 2014, our organizers took the next step forward with about 100 Labour Union Representatives from nine provinces across Canada, including several dozen presidents and key executives of Union Locals representing CUPE (the Canadian Union of Public Employees), Unifor (Canada’s largest private sector union), and Teamsters Canada, signing the Appeal for a Global Glass-Steagall Now!
With the Union of Quebec Municipalities (UMQ) conference in Gatineau, Quebec, last month and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) conference a week later in Niagara Falls, we had an opportunity to speak with hundreds of Mayors and City Councillors from across Canada. Overall nearly 30 City Councillors and Mayors from villages to major cities across Canada signed the Appeal and another 35 or so city officials who were met took a short briefing from our organizers, and some Glass-Steagall related political literature to study and left their coordinates to be called back.
What tended to catch the attention of those who signed the Appeal, was not just the need to escape from a looming financial and economic crisis through a return to banking regulations, but the need to create an entirely new perspective for the future by cooperating with the nations of Eurasia on projects such as the Eurasian Landbridge and the Maglev rail corridor across the Bering Strait .